In Re DDJ’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2020
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 173 N.C. App. 1 - In Re PLP · 140 N.C. App. 198 - State v. Jarman · 162 N.C. App. 355 - In Re Miller · State v. Etheridge · In the Matter of Plp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction to hear and determine any petition or motion relating to termination of parental rights to any juvenile who resides in, is found in, or is in the legal or actual custody of a county department of social services or licensed child-placing agency in the district at the time of filing of the petition or motion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“clerical errors include mistakes such as inadvertent checking of boxes on forms ... or minor discrepancies between oral rulings and written orders”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“no longer had custody as of the date of the filing of the petition[,] DSS, therefore, lacked standing to file the petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.