Hudson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Reiter v. Cooper · 516 So. 2d 846 - Biddie v. State · 500 So. 2d 1296 - Cox v. State · 539 So. 2d 436 - Connolly v. State · 495 So. 2d 1144 - Ex Parte City of Gadsden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Rule 21.1, A.R.Crim.P., clearly anticipates that written requested instructions shall be filed with the trial court and served on the opposing party prior to1 the closing arguments of counsel to the jury. “1 Rule 21.1, A.R.Crim.P., provides in part: “‘At the close of the evidence or at such other time during the trial as the court reasonably directs, either party may file and, in such event, shall serve on the opposing party, written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as set forth in those requests. The court shall inform counsel of its proposed action upon the requests prior to their arguments to the jury, but the court shall instruct the jury after the arguments are completed.’ (Emphasis added.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.