628 So. 2d 1102 - State v. Shearer’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

cited by 33 later decisions

states following

October 2016

most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably 914 So. 2d 1015 - Crain v. State (2005), Keene v. Nudera (1995)

33 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 464 So. 2d 1171 - Scott v. State · 336 So. 2d 93 - Johnson v. State · 494 So. 2d 211 - Gorham v. State · Shearer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[u]nder penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing motion and that the facts stated in it are true.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Armey v. State · 698 So. 2d 1313 - Mercade v. State
“provides that a signed declaration can substitute for a notarized oath.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 994 So. 2d 394 - JSL Const. Co. v. Levy · 908 So. 2d 508 - Ruiz v. State
“(1) When it is . . . required by law . . . that a document be verified by a person, the verification may be accomplished in the following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 to administer oaths; or (b) By the signing of the written declaration prescribed in subsection (2). . . . . (4) As used in this section: . . . . (b) The term "document" means any writing including, without limitation, any form, application, claim, notice, tax return, inventory, affidavit, pleading, or paper. (c) The requirement that a document be verified means that the document must be signed or executed by a person and that the person must state under oath or affirm that the facts or matters stated or recited in the document are true, or words of that import or effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
e.g. 908 So. 2d 508 - Ruiz v. State · 914 So. 2d 1015 - Crain v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.