Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Foret

628 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Foret’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

288
cited by 288 later decisions
15
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 281 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 288 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 755 So. 2d 226 - Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. (2000), Connecticut v. Porter (1997)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 281 state decisions — followed in 15 states

1480199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · Bulova Watch Co. v. United States · 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar · State v. Spigarolo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 288 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
    54 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “ensure that any and all scientific testimony or evidence admitted is not only relevant, but reliable.”
    43 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “testimony must rise to a threshold level of reliability in order to be admissible.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.