State v. Pickett’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 865 So. 2d 284 - State v. Hampton (2004), State v. Parker (2007)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · Angrist v. United States · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · State v. Hogan · 445 So. 2d 1171 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Among the factors to be considered are the defendant’s criminal history; the gravity or dangerousness of the offense; the viciousness of the crimes; the harm done to the victims; whether the defendant constitutes an unusual risk of danger to the public; defendant’s apparent disregard for the property of others; the potential for defendant’s rehabilitation; and whether defendant has received a benefit from a plea bargain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“Whoever commits the crime of Medicaid fraud shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or may be fined not more than twenty thousand dollars, or both. A sentence of at least one year of imprisonment shall be imposed without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence if the loss to the state is in excess of twenty-five thousand dollars.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rollins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.