Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 So. 2d 1371 - Cooper v. State

628 So. 2d 1371 - Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · United States v. Davis · 532 So. 2d 584 - Doby v. State · 583 So. 2d 1279 - Ashford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Offer of Proof. In case the ruling is one excluding evidence, the substance of the evidence was made known to the court by offer or was apparent from the context within which questions were asked.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “recognizes that this testimony would be admissible under Mississippi Rules of Evidence [608(a)] [2] , which provides that the credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by evidence in the form of opinion or reputation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`The relevancy and admissibility of evidence are largely within the discretion of the trial court and reversal may be had only where that discretion has been abused.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.