Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 SO2D 237 - Barker v. Whittington

Barker v. Whittington’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Bishop v. Wood · 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · 550 So. 2d 577 - Penalber v. Blount · Thornbrough v. Columbus and Greenville Railroad Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The controlling test of whether persons are residents of the same household at a particular time, within the meaning of the policy in question is not solely whether they are then residing together under one roof. The real test is whether the absence of the party of interest from the household of the alleged insured is intended to be permanent or only temporary—i.e., whether there is physical absence coupled with an intent not to return.... [T]he residence in question "emphasizes membership in a group rather than an attachment to a building"; and that it is "a matter of intention and choice" rather than one of location. Under proper facts, it has been held that separations from the common roof by college students, by members of the military services, and by spouses (albeit with divorce actions pending) did not, per se, destroy their household membership with their families and spouses. (Citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.