628 So. 2d 407 - Cochran v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 506 So. 2d 317 - Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. Peterson · 575 So. 2d 74 - Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC. · Indemnity Company of America v. Pugh · Millsap v. Williamson · 390 So. 2d 1055 - Langham Small Motors v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' Creighton v. Norris , 512 So.2d 111 , 112 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987).'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even though counsel did object to Officer Cochran's testimony regarding the fact that [the sergeant] had determined Cochran to be at fault, defense counsel made no objection to the admission of the testimony of [the sergeant] himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“based on the fact that [the sergeant], as a police officer, could not testify as to his determination of fault without the proper predicate having been laid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.