DeJonker v. McCaig’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(a) Any person offering to redeem must pay to the then holder of the legal title the value of all permanent improvements made on the land since the sale. . . . In response to written demand made under section 6-5-252 , the then holder of the legal title shall . . . furnish the proposed redemptioner with the amount claimed as the value of such permanent improvements; and within 10 days after receipt of such response, the proposed redemptioner either shall accept the value so stated by the then holder of the legal title or, disagreeing therewith, shall appoint a referee to ascertain the value of such permanent improvements and in writing notify the then holder of the legal title of his or her disagreement and of the fact and name of the referee appointed by him or her. . . . "(b) If a person offering to redeem fails or refuses to nominate a referee . . . he or she must pay the value put upon the improvements by the then holder of the legal title."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(b) If a person offering to redeem fails or refuses to nominate a referee . . . he or she must pay the value put upon the improvements by the then holder of the legal title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.