628 So. 2d 63 - State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 432 So. 2d 815 - State v. Johnson · State v. Polkey · 572 So. 2d 1166 - State v. Greer · 563 So. 2d 449 - State v. King · State v. Creel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A habitual offender bill of information does not charge a new crime but is only a method of increasing the punishment of second and subsequent felony offenses, State v. Walker, 416 So.2d 534 , 536 (La.1982). It is essential that the prior conviction(s) be formally charged in order to sentence a defendant as a multiple offender. State v. Hingle, 242 La. 844 , 139 So.2d 205, 206 (1961). The multiple offender indictment need only inform the accused of his previous felony conviction(s) within the time period set forth in LSA-R.S. 15:529.1. This satisfies the constitutional requirement that the accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him. State v. Bullock, 329 So.2d 733, 737 (La.1976); State v. Rowell, 306 So.2d 671, 675 (La.1975).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Freeman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.