Bunn v. Bunn’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hendrick v. Avent · Santiago v. United States · 447 So. 2d 812 - Ross v. Ross · Waid v. Waid · 415 So. 2d 1122 - Hinds v. Hinds
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining the weight to be accorded testimony, the trial court, as sole judge of the credibility of witnesses, considers the demeanor and apparent candor or evasiveness of the witnesses, and the trial court may disbelieve and disregard portions of testimony and should accept only that testimony it considers worthy of belief.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Meehan v. Meehan · D.H. v. B.M.““An award of alimony in gross is intended to effect a final determination of property rights of the parties and to attempt to compensate the wife for the loss of inchoate property rights in her husband’s estate. Boley v. Boley, 589 So.2d 1297 (Ala.Civ.App.1991).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.