628 So. 2d 81 - Hill v. Sampson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 341 So. 2d 332 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. · 373 So. 2d 498 - Reck v. Stevens · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. · Gaspard v. LeMaire · 555 So. 2d 1361 - Sharp v. Daigre
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While this argument has theoretical appeal, we are not inclined by these judicial means to establish `clear and convincing evidence' as the standard of proof for exemplary damages under [Louisiana's DUI law]. In our view, had the legislature intended a higher standard of proof than that of a preponderance of the evidence, it would have clearly so indicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Covered claim" shall not include any claim based on or arising from a pre-insolvency obligation of an insolvent insurer, including but not limited to contractual attorneys' fees and expenses, statutory penalties and attorneys' fees, court costs, interest and bond premiums, or any other expenses incurred prior to the determination of insolvency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brewster v. Santos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.