Morrison v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 409 So. 2d 858 - Walton v. Walton · 579 So. 2d 634 - Murphree v. Murphree · Chambliss v. Chambliss · 474 So. 2d 654 - Davis v. Davis · Owens v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`a trial court may not simply disallow testimony due to time constraints and the desire to clear its docket.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The integrity of our judicial system should be maintained by giving litigants a fair and just trial. The outcome may be the same, but the parties should be given an opportunity to present their evidence. Otherwise, the public's respect for and trust in our judicial system cannot be maintained."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the affidavits of the potential witnesses had not appeared in the record, this court would have been required to reverse and remand for a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.