Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 SW2D 382 - State v. Calmese

State v. Calmese’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Hoffa v. United States · State v. Higgins · United States v. Hall · State v. Swiney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... The police are not required to guess at their peril the precise moment at which they have probable cause to arrest a suspect, risking a violation of the Fourth Amendment if they act too soon, and a violation of the Sixth Amendment if they wait too long. Law enforcement officers are under no constitutional duty to call a halt to a criminal investigation the moment they have the minimum evidence to establish probable cause, a quantum of evidence which may fall short of the amount necessary to support a criminal conviction. Hoffa, 385 U.S. at 310 , 87 S.Ct.-at 417.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.