Bush v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Nethery v. State (1985), Rogers v. State (1993)
1 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · Albrecht v. State · Russell v. State · King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It must be remembered that the initial inquiry in determining the admissibility of evidence involves a comparison of probative value to potential prejudice. Further, in determining the admissibility of extraneous offenses, this Court must examine the “evidence which the state has to offer in proof of the essential elements of its case”, Albrecht supra at 101; Ruiz v. State [ 579 S.W.2d 206 (Tex.Cr.App.1979)], supra, in order to establish the necessary relationship between the offenses and the crime for which appellant stands charged.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lott v. State“[Wjhere a reversal rests solely on trial error, as distinguished from evidentiary sufficiency, the disposition of the ease is not tantamount to a finding that the State has failed to prove its case.... In that case, a reversal would not bar a retrial for the same offense under the double jeopardy clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morales“without injecting testimony tending to portray appellant as a drug addict”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rogers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.