Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 628 SW2D 625 - Dame v. Dame

Dame v. Dame’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2011

13 state decisions

901982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lindsay v. Lindsay · 41 Colo. App. 116 - In Re Marriage of Gallegos · Cawood v. Cawood · Duff v. Duff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nless otherwise agreed in writing or expressly provided in the decree.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Hence, we conclude that where, as here, maintenance is in a fixed and determinable amount to be paid either in a lump sum or is for a specific amount to be paid over a definite term, unless the power to do so is expressly reserved by the court, it is alimony in gross and has the finality of a judgment, and thus, is not subject to modification on the basis of a change in circumstances ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “KRS 403.250(1) states in part: Except as otherwise provided in subsection (6) of KRS 403.180, the provisions of any decree respecting maintenance may be modified only upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unconscionable. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.