Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 A2D 594 - State v. Ho Tai

State v. Ho Tai’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gervais · State v. Libby · State v. Carleton · State v. Caliendo · State v. Priest

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the State must prove that the acts constituting the crime were done. Second, the State must prove the defendant's involvement in the criminal acts. Mere suspicion of a defendant's involvement in the commission of a crime does not supply evidence sufficient to support a conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.