Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

629 F.2d 1182

Docket No. 79-1158.

Charles v. Warden

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 8, 1979.

Decided Oct. 3, 1980.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1980-10-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1980

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Anderson v. Charles · Charles v. Anderson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1980-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1F. Martin Tieber, Deputy State Appellate Defender Office, Lansing, Mich., for petitioner-appellant.

¶2Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Thomas L. Casey, Stephen Schuesler, Asst. Attys. Gen., Lansing, Mich., for respondent-appellee.

¶3Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, MERRITT, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In an opinion published at 610 F.2d 417 (6th Cir. 1979), this court, by a divided vote, reversed the judgment of the district court denying the application of Glen Charles for a writ of habeas corpus and ordered that the writ issue unless Charles be tried again within a reasonable time.

¶6In Anderson v. Charles, 447 U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 2180, 65 L.Ed.2d 222 (1980), the Supreme Court reversed the decision of this court and remanded the case for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of that court.

¶7Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision of this court, reported at 610 F.2d 417 (6th Cir. 1979), be and hereby is vacated and the judgment of the district court, denying the application for the writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed.

/629/f2d/1182 · .json · Public domain