Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 F.2d 144 - Halperin v. Central Intelligence Agency

Halperin v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis

629 F.2d 144 · 1980

Citation profile

201
cited by 201 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 98 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 201 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably Central Intelligence Agency v. Sims (1985), King v. United States Department of Justice (1987)

62 federal appellate · 98 district · 3 state decisions

70019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 28 U.S.C. § 537 · 42 U.S.C. § 2017 · 50 U.S.C. § 403 (§ 102 of the National Security Act of 1947) · 50 U.S.C. § 403G (Servicemembers Civil Relief Act) · 50 U.S.C. § 403J (Servicemembers Civil Relief Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Flast v. Cohen · Laird v. Tatum · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · United States v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 201 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Judges ... lack the expertise necessary to second-guess such agency opinions in the typical national security FOIA case.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`may aid in piecing together bits of other information even when the individual piece is not of obvious importance in itself.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]o require an actual showing that particular disclosures of”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.