Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 F.2d 287 - Johnson v. Trueblood

Johnson v. Trueblood’s Empirical Analysis

629 F.2d 287 · 1980

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 16 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2014 · most notably Liteky et al United States (1994), 94 Ohio App. 3d 579 - Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc. (1994)

37 federal appellate · 16 district · 13 state decisions

7701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Bates v. State Bar · Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co. · United States Steel Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[e]xtrajudicial bias' refers to a bias that is not derived from the evidence or conduct of the parties that the judge observes in the course of the proceedings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'that if actions are arguably taken for the benefit of the corporation, then the directors are presumed to have been exercising their sound business judgment'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “plaintiff must make a showing from which a factfinder might infer that impermissible motives predominated in the making of the decision in question.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.