Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 F.2d 302 - Johnson v. Trueblood

Johnson v. Trueblood’s Empirical Analysis

629 F.2d 302 · 1980

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc. (1985), United States v. Collins (1990)

28 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

2301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Catlin v. United States · Carey v. Population Services International · Leis v. Flynt · Buckley v. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists · Ruhm v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]ome sort of procedural requirement serves a number of salutary purposes. It ensures that the attorney's reputation and livelihood are not unnecessarily damaged, protects the client's interest, and promotes more of an appearance of regularity in the court's processes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the conduct of the attorney that is the subject of the inquiry, and the specific reason this conduct may justify revocation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “All that we will mandate is that the attorney be given a meaningful opportunity to respond to identified charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.