Jones v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
629 F.2d 334 · 1980
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
July 1997
most recently cited
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Lucas · Oppenheim v. Finch · Adams v. Weinberger · Smith v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Contributions must be made regularly and must be large enough to meet an important part of your ordinary living costs. Ordinary living costs are the costs for your food, shelter, routine medical care, and similar necessities. If the insured person only provides gifts or donations once in a while for special purposes, they will not be considered contributions for your support. Although the insured’s contributions must be made on a regular basis, temporary interruptions caused by circumstances beyond the insured person’s control such as illness or unemployment, will be disregarded unless during this interruption someone else takes over responsibility for supporting you on a permanent basis.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“because the loss of small, regular contributions to a poor family would cause the economic dislocation the Act seeks to prevent”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.