Perry v. Blum’s Empirical Analysis
629 F.3d 1 · 2010
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 29 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg · Cumpiano v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico · Ryan Operations Gp Nvr Lp Nvr v. Santiam-Midwest Lumber Co Bright Wood Corp · United States v. Saccoccia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] party against whom judicial estoppel is invoked, typically, must be the same party who made the prior inconsistent representation.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen the parties agree on the substantive law that should govern, 'we may hold the parties to their plausible choice of law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“courts sometimes have allowed judicial estoppel when the estopped party was responsible in fact for the earlier representation or when the estopped party was the assignee of a litigation claim or assumed the original party's role.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.