Puc-Ruiz v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
629 F.3d 771 · 2010
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229C (§ 240b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Janis · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya · United States v. Calderon-Medina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the IJ lacks jurisdiction, his decisions are nullities.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'As a general rule, ... prejudice will have to be specifically demonstrated,' unless compliance with the regulation is mandated by the Constitution, in which case prejudice may be presumed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sanchez v. Sessions“We review questions of law de novo but accord substantial deference to the BIA's interpretation of immigration statutes and regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marambo v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.