Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

629 F. App'x 570

Bardes v. Auld

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2016

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2016-01-19

Decided 2016-01-19

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3David A. Bardes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Ms civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Bardes v. Auld, No. 1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH, 2015 WL 5796466 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/629/fappx/570 · .json · Public domain