Bernard v. Attebury’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2018
2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Air West, Inc. · C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens Bank · 72 Wash. 2d 887 - Luisi Truck Lines, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission · Terry v. Zions Cooperative Mercantile Institution · Richardson v. Grand Central Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In deciding whether the [district] court's order ... constitutes a final judgment and as such invokes the doctrine of res judicata we are guided by Rule 54(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any order ... that adjudicates ... the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties does not end the action as to any of the ... parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may be changed at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all ... the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.