Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 SO2D 1195 - State v. Lockhart

State v. Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2018

23 state decisions

90199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 440 So. 2d 129 - State v. Benoit · 563 So. 2d 449 - State v. King · State v. King · State v. Burton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the Louisiana Constitution grants to a criminal defendant the right to challenge jurors peremptorily, it does not give him the right to a specified number of challenges. The discretion to fix the number of challenges has been given to the legislature. State v. Bennett, 454 So.2d 1165, 1174 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 460 So.2d 604 (La.1984). See also La. Code Crim. P. art. 799. Accordingly, we find that a system of exercising simultaneous peremptory challenges specifically provided in a local rule pursuant to Article 788 B does not violate Louisiana Constitution Article 1, § 17.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The state's rebuttal shall be confined to answering the argument of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.