629 So. 2d 185 - Powell v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2019
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 67 So. 2d 215 - Florida Ventilated Awning Co. v. Dickson · 413 So. 2d 170 - Lafferty v. Lafferty · 481 So. 2d 1228 - Noord v. Katz · 419 So. 2d 670 - American Indem. Co. v. Comeau · 485 So. 2d 2 - Wiley v. Wiley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... evidence must come from witnesses qualified in the areas concerned. The individual experts whose charges are at issue obviously would be qualified to provide such evidence; also, another qualified expert in the same field, properly informed from the trial record, could also offer competent proof of reasonableness and necessity sufficient, in and of itself, to establish a prima facie case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The prevailing party's burden, at an evidentiary costs hearing, to recover an expert witness fee is 'to present testimony concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the fee.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“sought to meet their burden at the evidentiary hearing by relying solely upon one `omnibus witness,' an experienced trial attorney, who was not shown to have expertise (i.e., training or experience) in the various fields of endeavor at issue... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.