629 So. 2d 276 - Freeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 464 So. 2d 1171 - Scott v. State · 316 So. 2d 50 - State Ex Rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal · 494 So. 2d 211 - Gorham v. State · Williams v. State · 510 So. 2d 339 - Ferro v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not possible to determine from the record presently before us whether the state was prejudiced by Freeman's late-filed supplement. After remand the trial court may consider any allegations of prejudice that may be raised before ruling on the merits of the supplemental motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McConn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.