Chastine v. Broome’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably McFadden v. State (1999), J. F. v. State (1998)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 615 So. 2d 688 - Spencer v. State · 441 So. 2d 1083 - Livingston v. State · 565 So. 2d 1332 - MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc. · 97 So. 2d 181 - Crosby v. State · Randolph v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Obviously, the trial judge serves as the neutral arbiter in the proceedings and must not enter the fray by giving `tips' to either side.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When the judge enters into the proceedings and becomes a participant, a shadow is cast upon judicial neutrality so that disqualification is required.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.