Wilkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 565 So. 2d 606 - Ex Parte Rice · Blount v. State · 580 So. 2d 750 - Kuk v. State · 494 So. 2d 869 - Vintson v. State · 593 So. 2d 150 - Ellison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court in Blount v. State, [ 572 So.2d 498 (Ala.Crim.App.1990) ] clearly held that, ‘before a subsequent petition can be deemed successive, a previous petition must have been considered on its merits,’ id. at 500 . The Blount court further ruled that, regardless of whether the subsequent petition raises the same or different grounds, ‘the first inquiry in determining whether a subsequent petition ... is successive is whether a prior petition was decided on its merits,’ id. at 500-01 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carmichael v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.