Ingram v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

cited by 22 later decisions

states following

November 2013

most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2013

22 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Edwards · 420 So. 2d 812 - Harris v. State · 364 So. 2d 1 - Smith v. State · 601 So. 2d 145 - Carnold v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Assertions of counsel in an unverified motion . . . are bare allegations and cannot be considered as evidence or proof of the facts alleged.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Ex Parte Walker · Spellman v. State
“"Although the death of a witness may constitute prejudice in determining whether a defendant was denied a speedy trial, Ex parte Blake , 469 So.2d 1301 , 1304 (Ala. 1985), the record in this case contains no showing of the expected testimony that would allegedly have been provided by the deceased witness."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 650 So. 2d 593 - Jackson v. State
“"[T]his 19-month delay is not sufficient in and of itself to warrant a finding that the appellant has been denied a speedy trial. 'The delay or passage of time alone does not constitute the denial of a speedy trial.' Kimberly v. State , 501 So.2d 534 , 538 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 650 So. 2d 593 - Jackson v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.