Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 SO2D 929 - State v. Rohm

State v. Rohm’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 437 So. 2d 142 - Lowe v. Price · State v. Kruger · State v. Rohm · State v. Eubanks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the speedy trial time provided in rule 3.191(a) has fully run, and the trial court grants a timely motion for discharge during the unexpired 15-day window period which is reversed on appeal, does the state on remand have the 15-day window period to bring the defendant to trial, or instead the 90-day appellate mandate period?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.