¶1On this second appeal, we affirm Gus Miller’s sentences in all respects except the habitual offender designation for his misdemeanor convictions. Habitual offender treatment is not allowed for misdemeanors. Teasley v. State, 610 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), review denied, 618 So.2d 1370 (Fla.1993). Therefore, we remand only for the trial court to delete the habitual offender designation on the two misdemeanor sentences.
629 So. 2d 961
Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 22, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-12-22
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2001
1 state decisions
Relies on 618 So. 2d 1365 - State v. Hester · 610 So. 2d 26 - Teasley v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-12-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →