629 So. 2d 980 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State · 249 So. 2d 27 - St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry · 417 So. 2d 272 - Daytona Migi Corp. v. Daytona Automotive Fiberglass Inc. · LEASING, INC. v. Heider · 573 So. 2d 60 - Harrison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court X'd the blanks preceding both the words `Court Minutes' and the words `Order (Motion Hearing),' indicating that the subject form was both the court minutes and an order of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“neither contains any substantive changes nor resolves any genuine ambiguity in the [court minutes]; thus, the subsequent order ... cannot delay the time for seeking review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.