Danis Ind. v. Ground Imp. Techniques’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2017
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison · 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe · 525 So. 2d 875 - Holloman v. State · 549 So. 2d 1005 - Ranger Ins. Co. v. Bal Harbour Club
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`the trial judge must evaluate the relationship between the successful and unsuccessful claims and determine whether the investigation and prosecution of the successful claims can be separated from the unsuccessful claims.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Upon the rendition of a judgment or decree by any of the courts of this state against an insurer and in favor of any named or omnibus insured or the named beneficiary under a policy or contract executed by the insurer, the trial court or, in the event of an appeal in which the insured or beneficiary prevails, the appellate court shall adjudge or decree against the insurer and in favor of the insured or beneficiary a reasonable sum as fees or compensation for the insured's or beneficiary's attorney prosecuting the suit in which the recovery is had.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“DOES THE PREVAILING PARTY TEST OF Moritz v. Hoyt Enterprises, 604 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1992), APPLY TO AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES MADE PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 627.428 AND 627.756, FLORIDA STATUTES?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.