Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 SW2D 535 - State v. Burks

State v. Burks’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2010

4 state decisions

201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Frankoviglia · State v. Rothaus · State v. Morgan · State v. Johnson · State v. Hampton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “neither a direct nor indirect reference to the failure of a defendant to testify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “You have been presented with no evidence inconsistent with that.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is clear and uncontroverted as to what happened;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.