629 S.W.2d 77
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided February 24, 1982
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · decided 1982-02-24
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2008
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1982-02-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurring.
¶2There being other evidence sufficient to support the conviction, I concur in the majority opinion. However, I disagree that “blood” is an “item” within the meaning of Section 10 of Art. 18.02, Tex.Crim.Code Pro. Ann. (Vernon 1977). If the Legislature in the amendment had meant to include “blood” they could have said so.