Durrett v. Buxton’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1937
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fones Hardware Co. v. Erb · Wiegel v. Pulaski County · Chamberlain v. State · Worthen v. Roots · Burton's adr. v. Lockert's exrs.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court shall specify the amount of appropriations for each purpose in dollars and cents, and the total amount of appropriations for all county and district purposes for any one year shall not exceed 90 per cent, of the taxes levied for that year.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Mayo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.