Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 ARKAPP 190 - Diehl v. State

Diehl v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2010

9 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · Boone v. State · Harris v. State · Dowell v. State · 25 Ark. App. 335 - Blakemore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no hesitancy in holding that the appellant was in actual physical control of the vehicle.”); People v. Khan, 182 Misc.2d 83, 84 , 697 N.Y.S.2d 457 (N.Y.Sup.App.Term 1997) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.