63 Cal. 375
Decided May 9, 1883
California Supreme Court · decided 1883-05-09
The action was brought against three persons as partners, but was afterwards dismissed as to two of them without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to proceed against the remaining defendant as a member of the firm. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of Mb. Justice McKee.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1883-05-09
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1912
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We concur. There was evidence tending to prove that Joynt was informed of the contents of the books without objecting to the manner in tvhich they were kept. Evidence of his having examined the books, together with the entries themselves, properly went to the jury as tending to prove his recognition of the partnership.
¶2Hearing in Bank denied.