Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Cal. 2d 124 - Saala v. McFarland

63 Cal. 2d 124 - Saala v. McFarland’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

143
cited by 143 later decisions
11
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

140 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably 2 Cal. 3d 956 - Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co. (1970), 27 Cal. 3d 465 - Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior Court (1980)

140 state decisions — followed in 11 states

52019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baugh v. Rogers · 59 Cal. 2d 668 - Meyer v. Blackman · 142 Cal. App. 2d 126 - Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'n v. Cal-Farm Insurance · 48 Cal. 2d 617 - Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co. · 46 Cal. 2d 349 - Reinert v. Industrial Accident Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “acting within the scope of his [or her] employment”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Tjhis court recognized ... that scope of employment defines a more restricted area of employee conduct than the customary phrase “arising out of and in the course of the employment.” We stated: “Although this court has not gone so far as to hold that every injury to an employee attending to his duties and within the course of his employment is compensable, it has, in many cases, upheld the allowance of compensation for injuries arising out of acts not strictly within the scope of the employment: returning from lunch [citation]; drinking wine because of indisposition [citation]; smoking [citation].... ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “arising out of and in the course of employment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.