Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Cal. 2d 659 - People v. Cockrell

63 Cal. 2d 659 - People v. Cockrell’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

545
cited by 545 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 508 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 545 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2014 · most notably Schmerber v. State of California (1966), 12 Cal. 3d 731 - People v. Hill (1974)

4 federal appellate · 508 state decisions

3500196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · Griffin v. California · Ker v. State of California · Malloy v. Hogan · United States v. Rabinowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 545 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * after the arrest and during an official examination, while respondent is in custody, it is common knowledge that he has a right to say nothing. Only under peculiar circumstances can there seem to be any duty then to speak. Lacking such circumstances, to draw a derogatory inference from mere silence is to compel the respondent to testify; * * McCarthy v. United States, 25 F.2d 298, 299 (6th Cir. 1928); United States v. Pearson, 344 F.2d 430, 431 (6th Cir. 1965). See also People v. Cockrell, 63 Cal.2d 659 , 47 Cal.Rptr. 788 , 408 P.2d 116 (1965).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Reasonable or probable cause is shown if a man of ordinary care and prudence would be led to believe and conscientiously entertain an honest and strong suspicion that the accused is guilty. (People v. Torres, 56 Cal.2d 864, 866 , 17 Cal.Rptr. 495 , 366 P.2d 823 ; People v. Fischer, 49 Cal.2d 442, 446 , 317 P.2d 967 .)””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In order to be incident to an arrest a search must also be limited to the premises where the arrest is made, have a definite object, and be reasonable in scope. ( People v. Cruz, 61 Cal.2d 861, 866 [ 40 Cal. Rptr. 841 , 395 P.2d 889 ].)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.