63 Cal. 2d 764 - People v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
95 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently December 1994 · most notably 9 Cal. 4th 331 - People v. Scott (1994), 23 Cal. 3d 545 - People v. Perez (1979)
95 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 58 Cal. 2d 748 - People v. McFarland · 31 Cal. 2d 555 - People v. Slobodion · People v. Winthrop · People v. Gay · 67 Cal. App. 2d 360 - People v. Tenner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... whenever any person is found guilty of the offense specified herein, and it is charged and admitted or found to be true that he is more than 10 years older than his coparticipant in such an act, which coparticipant is under the age of 14, ... he shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than three years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If multiple punishment has been erroneously imposed, the appropriate procedure on appeal is to eliminate the effect of the judgment as to the lesser offense or offenses insofar as the penalty alone is concerned. [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An act or omission which is made punishable in different ways by different provisions of this code may be punished under either of such provisions, but in no case can it be punished under more than one....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.