Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 CAL4TH 261 - People v. Franklin

People v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
7
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

122 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Woodson v. North Carolina · Robinson v. State of California · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · Miller v. Alabama · Graham v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the diminished culpability of juveniles as compared to adults, the hallmark features of youth, and any subsequent growth and increased maturity of the prisoner.'”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"In sum, the combined operation of section 3051 [and the related statutes] means that Franklin is now serving a life sentence that includes a meaningful opportunity for release during his 25th year of incarceration. Such a sentence is neither LWOP nor its functional equivalent. Because Franklin is not serving an LWOP sentence or its functional equivalent, no Miller claim arises here. The Legislature's enactment of Senate Bill No. 260 has rendered moot Franklin's challenge to his original sentence under Miller . " ( Ibid. )”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “culpability or cognitive maturity, or otherwise bears on the influence of youth-related factors.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.