Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Cal. App. 4th 246 - Mapstead v. Anchundo

63 Cal. App. 4th 246 - Mapstead v. Anchundo’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably 37 Cal. 4th 986 - Costa v. Superior Court (2006), 108 Cal. App. 4th 123 - Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. Wade (2003)

26 state decisions

120199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian · 32 Cal. 3d 668 - Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of Governments · 49 Cal. 3d 74 - City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court · 33 Cal. 3d 348 - Westside Community for Independent Living, Inc. v. Obledo · 30 Cal. 3d 638 - Assembly v. Deukmejian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A post office box, unlike a residence address, provides no indication as to the actual physical location of a person’s residence. A person may move to a new residence (and no longer be eligible to vote) but keep the same post office box. With only a post office box on the petition, the petition signer has made no statement regarding the physical location of his or her residence. The petition does not show (and the Registrar has no way of knowing) whether the signer was a qualified registered voter at the time of signing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.