Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 CONNAPP 284 - State v. Paris

State v. Paris’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Emigrant Savings Bank v. Cam · State v. Sivri · In Re As · State v. Decaro · State v. Boles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e are not persuaded that evidentiary claims, not made at trial, can be preserved for appeal by raising them in a motion for a new trial after a guilty verdict. The problems inherent in allowing counsel to wait until after an adverse verdict to raise such objections to evidence are too obvious to warrant discussion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.