Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 CONNAPP 451 - Lundborg v. Lawler

Lundborg v. Lawler’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pamela B. v. Ment · Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of Branford · Santopietro v. City of New Haven · In re Adam R. · Mazziotti v. Allstate Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he plaintiff argues that any allegation of fraud in Probate Court proceedings confers jurisdiction on the Superior Court sitting as a court of general CT Page 479 jurisdiction. [The plaintiff] claims that such jurisdictional authority exists no matter how thoroughly the fraud was explored, or could have been explored, in prior probate proceedings. In other words, any allegation of fraud acts as an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.