Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.1d 172 - Killien v. Hyde

Killien v. Hyde’s Empirical Analysis

63 F. 172 · 1894

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
May 1925
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1925

3 federal appellate · 5 district ·

401894190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baltimore Co v. Baugh · Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Ross · The Britannia the Beaconsfield the Britannia v. Cleugh Same · Chicago St Ry Co v. Ross · McCullough v. New York & N. Steamboat Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.