Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

63 F. 925

Docket No. 444.

King v. Mosher

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1894.)

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1894-10-15

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.</p> <p>Action by Shepherd H. King against Charles W. Mosher and others, commenced in the district court of Lancaster county, Neb., and removed on petition of defendants into the circuit court of the United States for the district of Nebraska. There was an order overruling' a motion to remand the cause to the state court and sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, and a final judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1935

2 state decisions

3 counsel of record

Relies on Bailey v. Mosher

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1894-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

¶2Action by Shepherd H. King against Charles W. Mosher and others, commenced in the district court of Lancaster county, Neb., and removed on petition of defendants into the circuit court of the United States for the district of Nebraska. There was an order overruling' a motion to remand the cause to the state court and sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, and a final judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4Allen \V. Field and Edward P. Holmes, for plaintiff in error.

¶5T. M. Marquette, J. W. Deweese, F. M. Hall, and F. E. Bishop, for defendants in error Homer J. Walsh and others.

¶6Charles O. Whedon and Charles E. Magoon, for defendant in error Thompson.

¶7Before CALDWELL, SANBORN, and THAYER, Circuit Judges.

/63/f1d/925 · .json · Public domain